In Apple's case by adding proprietary GUIs and other features which mean that nobody else can the free stuff and compete with them. In Google's case by keeping the most important bits on servers where you can't access it. Software would start to advance at the rate that benefitted its users, not the people stealing from them.Īpple, and to a large extent Google, have come with new business models where they take the output of that process and rebundle it in a way which allows them to avoid sharing the key features which differentiate their products. The vast efficiency gain would have been shared between the (no longer) customers of big IT companies like Microsoft and the programmers. The basis of this would be that most companies would use the same FOSS software, sharing that from company to company. What makes you think it has anything to do with generosity?Īssuming he's not a shill (in which case the answer would be his pay check), propaganda, stupidity and things like ESR's essay saying that the GPL is no longer needed.įor a time, up to a few years ago it looked like programmers could become truly independent of the companies they work directly for, a bit like graphic artists, shop keepers, SAP specialists and so on.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
December 2022
Categories |